Albanian Taxation System - What Happens Inside?

Countries designed their tax collection systemsand we understand that this is giving rise to the
according to their specific needs and traditions, includingwillingness of the lower courts to hear tax appeals
prepayment or withholding of income and other taxeswithout requiring adherence to the statutory escalation
prior to lodgment of the income tax return andprocess described above.
reconciliation of the actual tax payable.Most business taxpayers utilize the services of
The Albanian tax system today does not meet theprofessional advisers, and that many tax disputes are
equity, transparency and predictability criteria of a wellsettled outside the formal appeals process. The costs
functioning tax system. It contains significantfor taxpayers utilizing professional representatives as
opportunities for corruption, which further damages thea matter of course in all dealings with the tax and
accountability and credibility of the system. Of course,court authorities are relatively high compared to other
that these problems are at the attention of thecountries in the region.
Albanian government and the current work of the IMFThe administration of VAT refunds (which is principally
(with extensive assistance from German and Swedenan issue for exporters) is universally acknowledged to
consultants) in collaboration with the General Taxationbe a problem. Although the law provides for a 30 day
Directorate (GDT) is largely directed to establishing andstatutory limit on the provision of VAT refunds, with
implementing a better managerial and reporting systemthe payment of interest for delays over that time, the
within the GDT to tackle many of the administrativeconsensus amongst both taxpayers and the tax
defects.structure officials the refunds are simply not being
To assist the government to accelerate theprocessed at all. The problem is fully acknowledged by
improvement of the tax administration and thethe tax administration. According to the GDT, the
investment environment, is the recently assistance ofproblem arises mainly because there is no allocation
USAID Project for a number of specific issues thatfrom the budget for the purpose of VAT refunds,
are currently perceived as major operating barriers towhereas the VAT withheld is paid immediately into
businesses.consolidated revenue.
In general, large businesses bear a disproportionateThe registration process for new businesses in
burden of taxation as compared to small businessesparticular is complex. The relatively low level of
and individuals. This is supported by the revenueregistrations in the small business sector (currently
figures . Large businesses and their professionalapproximately 49.000) is of concern in the context of
advisers report a perception of significant nonthe relatively narrow tax base and the disproportionate
compliance, under reporting and lack of enforcement inburden that this places on 'legitimate' business, as
relation to businesses registered under the "small"discussed earlier.
businesses system. Small businesses can easily 'closeWhat to do then?
up shop' in order to avoid their tax debts, andAnywhere in the world, a well-functioning tax system is
recommence business virtually the next day under ajudged by its:
new name. It has also been reported that many- efficiency (in revenue collection);
individual taxpayers are registering as small businesses- equity (both in the burden of taxation amongst the
in order to obtain more favorable taxation rates and totaxpayer base and in the fair administration of the
overcome the withholding requirements for salary andtaxation system);
wage income. The revenue shortfall caused by lack of- transparency (taxpayers are entitled to know what
enforcement in relation to small businesses andthe burden of tax will be for a period); and
individuals is then met through heavy handed- predictability
compliance and enforcement activity for largeIn contrary, the present tax system in Albania fails to
businesses.meet some of these criteria's. The system relies on a
Therefore the functioning of the system is perceivedvery narrow revenue base, primarily drawn from VAT
as arbitrary and inconsistent between different groupstax payers. The system is geared more to meeting
of taxpayers.monthly and trimester revenue targets than to
It appears that the method for setting revenue targetssupporting the broadening of the tax base by
for individual GDT employees, and standard targets forencouraging business activities. The rates and methods
audit adjustments by the GDT has contributed to theof tax collections, particularly the pre-payment of
perception of a disproportionate focus on largeprofits tax imposed on the start-ups do not encourage
business taxpayers. Large taxpayers are an "easynew business entries and may, in reality, encourage the
target" for auditors who are trying to achieve theirexpansion of "informal" businesses. The current
individual revenue targets through adjustments. Apartsystem also seriously lacks transparency and
from the quality of audit case selection, conduct ofpredictability. Large discretion and arbitration allowed at
audits and audit reporting, which is discussed in greaterthe operational levels further invite abuse and
detail below, the sheer number of audits taking place iscorruption.
also creating a compliance burden for business.It's an important and big issue the VAT refunds. It
Business report on average 4 'tax inspections' pershould be reviewed as a matter of urgency, in view of
year. There is no official limit on the number of auditsthe necessity of encouraging exporting activities, a goal
or inspections that may be conducted in a given period,that Albania gives priority in the upcoming decade. The
and it is not uncommon for auditors to be present on aAlbanian tax administration should take immediate
company's premises for many months at a time.measures to ensure the availability of the funds to
Albania operates under a civil legal system which doesfacilitate the VAT refunds. The tax structures, in the
not rely on precedent for applying past decisions. Inmeantime, should establish an effective system for
many civil jurisdictions, for the purposes of interpretingexamining the refund claims and having them
statutes, Ministerial directives and similar documentsprocessed in a timely manner for all VAT taxpayers.
that reveal the intention of the legislature and theIn Albania, the rate of prepayment is more frequent
meaning of specific provisions are often issued andand the method for variation of installments of profits
are considered to be more a primary source of lawtax is also very cumbersome. In particular, as a general
(and therefore more influential than in Common Lawapproach, it should not be necessary to go through an
jurisdictions).appeals process in order to vary the amount of tax
In relation to the work of the GDT generally, changesinstallments. An acceptable basis for varying
in policy, and amendments to the law, there is noinstallments should be agreed in consultation between
regular forum for consultation or discussion betweenbusiness and professional representatives and the
the GDT and taxpayers and their representatives. ThisGDT (for example, it is not clear why accounts
can lead to frustration for all affected parties, sinceprepared by suitably qualified persons should not be
taxpayers feel they are not properly consulted oracceptable to the tax administration at first instance,
considered in the development of new laws that willgiven the existing penalties for the provision of
directly affect them and the drafters may find thatmisleading information).
their laws become subject to policy review after theIn general, bank accounts should only be frozen after
drafting process has been completed .initial collection procedures (letter and formal demand)
As the tax system matures and legislation inevitablyhave been exhausted and the debt has been overdue
increases in volume and complexity, it is just the timefor more than 30 days. The current system of
to fulfill the need for a comprehensively redraftedenforcement, particularly the application of the power
code. This process is undertaking by the government,to freeze bank accounts, is not working towards its
carefully managed and has the broad support of thegoals. The inconsistent and heavy handed application
business community to avoid the imposition of ad hocof enforcement powers, compounded by the
"policy" during the drafting process. In this regard, butdelegation of the power to local directors can
also as a general proposition, business and taxpayerdiscourage companies from using the banking system,
consultation needs to be better managed.while providing an opportunity for abuse of power and
The profits tax (applicable to businesses with acorruption. At a minimum, the increased focus on
turnover of over 8 million lek) is levied prospectively ontaxpayer education by the tax structures should
a monthly basis. For this purpose, a new business willinclude publicizing the circumstances in which
be required to estimate its profit for the following 12enforcement powers will be exercised according to
months. Businesses have complained that it has notthe law and the form that this will take. In this context,
been acceptable in practice to quote 'nil' for the firstthe appeal and review provisions should also be
year profit, even though it is not unusual for a businesspublicized so that taxpayers are aware of their rights
to make a loss in its first year of trading. According toand to encourage officers of the tax administration to
the GDT, a nil profits estimate should be acceptable ifexercise their powers appropriately. There should be a
it is supportable by the taxpayer. This suggestsstreamlined administrative process for the review of
another example of inconsistency between the lawenforcement proceedings since the usual 30 day
and the implementation. Businesses also reportperiod under the current appeals process is not
difficulty in having their estimated profits varied on theappropriate for a taxpayer who may not be able to
basis of their un-audited accounts. If it is the case thattrade during the period (due to frozen accounts or
profits are to differ from the estimated profits for theseizure of goods).
current year, it is necessary to go through the formal,The tax administration should speed up the
costly and time consuming appeals process in order toestablishment of regular consultative forums between
have the estimated profits varied for the purpose ofGDT, the Ministry of Finance and interest business
determining the amount of installments payable eachgroups. Such forums will play an important role in
month.collecting inputs from all parties and building consensus
In relation to tax appeals, the law requires that withinfor reforms. In the longer term, a comprehensive
the court system, an appeal be heard by the Taxredraft of the tax codes by specialist legislative
Appeals Tribunal at first instance. The decision of thedrafters in the MOF and the GDT may be warranted.
Tribunal may then be reviewed by the Appeals Court.But, the Government must ensure that sufficient policy
The main complaint from the business community inconsultation takes place before the drafting of
relation to the appeals process is the currentlegislation starts. With the understanding and support of
requirement that 100% of the disputed tax must beall parties affected, the passage of the legislation will
paid before the appeal will be heard. The Constitutionalbecome more certain, and its implementation will be
Court has ruled that this requirement is unconstitutionalmore likely.