Australian Tax - Getting a Tax Deduction For Interest When Investing in a Hybrid Trust

In Australian taxation law there have been numerousinterest by Mr Forrest and the receipt of assessable
cases that deal with the question of when interest,income from the trust. This was because any income
which is paid on borrowed money, is tax deductible. Athat Mr Forrest would receive was at the discretion of
recent case, decided by the Full Federal Court, alsothe trustee. So, for example, Mr Forrest may never
dealt with this question in the situation of a hybrid trust.receive any income if the trustee always determined
A hybrid trust is one where there is a mixture of athat all of the amounts received by the trust were
discretionary component and a fixed component. If acapital.
trust is a discretionary trust (only) then the trustee hasThe taxpayer objected to the assessment and
the power to distribute the income and capital of theappealed to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal which
trust at the trustee's sole discretion to the beneficiariesagreed with the Commissioner's view and stated that
of the trust. A fixed trust (often a unit trust) is onethe trust was a discretionary trust. The taxpayer then
where the income and capital flows, normally, to theappealed from that decision to the Full Federal Court.
unit holder beneficiaries in proportion to their unit holding.So, the matter was heard before three judges.
A hybrid trust is a mixture of the two.The Full Federal Court disagreed with both the
The case of Forrest v Commissioner of TaxationCommissioner and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.
dealt with the issue of a unit holder of the trust (MrThe Full Federal Court said that the power of the
Forrest) borrowing $4.5 million to purchase units in thetrustee to determine whether a receipt of the trust
trust. Mr Forrest then sought to deduct the interest thatwas either capital or income was not a power to
he paid on this debt. This was just over $860,000 overunilaterally decide that an amount was capital or
the course of three years.income without regard to the receipt's true nature. That
The Commissioner of Taxation argued that theis, an amount that was clearly income could not be
interest was not deductible because the way in whichdeemed by the trustee to be of a capital nature and
the trustee of the trust was required to determinedirected away from the unit holders to the
what is income attributable to the unit holders anddiscretionary beneficiaries. This meant the power given
what is income attributable to the discretionaryto the trustee in the trust deed to determine whether a
beneficiaries, was something that did not create areceipt was capital or income, was merely stating the
"present entitlement" for the unit holders, of which Mrpower of the trustee to determine whether an amount
Forrest was one. The argument of the Commissionerwas capital or income according to law and not an
was that the trust deed gave the trustee the powerarbitrary power to say that a receipt was capital or
to determine what was capital and what was incomeincome according to the opinion of the trustee.
for the purposes of the trust. Under the trust deed theThis meant that, in the opinion of the Full Federal Court,
capital gains (both realised and unrealised) were to beany income receipts received by the trust were bound
distributed to the discretionary beneficiaries and allto be directed towards the unit holders in the trust.
other amounts were to be distributed to the unitTherefore there was a clear expectation that Mr
holders. Because the trustee had to make a decisionForrest would receive income in respect of the units
as to what amounts were capital and what amountsthat he had purchased in the trust and, accordingly, the
were income, the Commissioner argued that thereinterest deductions were permitted.
was no clear connection between the incurring of theWishing you easier business.