Double Taxation Agreements and India

A tax is a governmental assessment or charge uponIndia-U.A.E Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement:
the property value, transactions such as transfers and1. For the purposes of this Agreement, the term
sales, licenses granting a right and/or income of a"resident of a Contracting State" means any person
person or organization.who, under the laws of that State, is liable to tax
Due to phenomenal growth in international trade andtherein by reason of his domicile, residence, place of
commerce and increasing interactivity among themanagement, place of incorporation or any other
nations, residents of one country extend their spherecriterion of a similar nature.
of business operations to other countries.2. Under the Indo-UAE Double Tax Treaty, there shall
Cross-country flow of capital, services and technologybe no tax imposed in India on capital gains income
is the order of the day particularly after our countryearned by a UAE resident from disposal of shares of
embarked on the path of globalization of economy.Indian company.
This is generally defined as the imposition of3. No corporate tax and capital gains tax present in
comparable taxes in two (or more) countries on theUAE.
same taxpayer in respect of the same subject matter4. For the purposes of this Agreement, the term
and for identical periods. Presence of double or multiple"resident of a Contracting State" means any person
taxation acts as a major determining factor inwho, under the laws of that State, is liable to tax
decisions relating to location of investment, technologytherein by reason of his domicile, residence, place of
etc. as it affects the profits of a business enterprise.management, place of incorporation or any other
The effort is, therefore, to ensure that heavy taxcriterion of a similar nature.
burden is not cast as a result of double or multipleSome of the landmark cases on India's Double Tax
taxation. The object is achieved by the GovernmentAvoidance Treaties with the above countries:
entering into agreements with other countries whereby1. The MA Rafique case (1995): In the first ever ruling
the respective jurisdiction is so identified that aon the subject, the AAR (Authority for Advance
particular income is taxed in one country only or, inRuling) in the case of MA Rafique (213 ITR 317) held
case it is taxed in both the countries, suitable relief isthat the applicant was eligible to the benefits of the
provided in one country to mitigate the hardshipIndia-UAE tax treaty and that the capital gains, in
caused by taxation in another jurisdiction.question, would not be subject to tax in India. The AAR
Such agreements are known as "Double Taxinter alia observed as follows: "That though there was
Avoidance Agreements" (DTAA) also termed asno income-tax or wealth tax on individuals in any of
"Tax Treaties". The statutory authority to enter intothe UAE nations, the fact that a comprehensive
such agreements is vested in the Central Governmentagreement (tax treaty) was considered necessary in
by the provisions contained in Section 90 of thespite of a clear knowledge that there was no such tax
Income Tax Act in terms of which India has, by theon individuals in UAE could only mean that the
end of March 2002, entered into 64 agreements ofagreement was intended to encourage the inflow of
this nature which are comprehensive in the sense thatfunds from Dubai and other Emirates to India for
they deal with different types of income which mayinvestment." Read in this background, Article 13 clearly
be subjected to double taxation.left it to the UAE to deal with the capital gains on
It is not unusual for a business or individual who ismovable property realized by all UAE investors. In
resident in one country to make a taxable gainother words, the AAR held that definition of the term
(earnings, profits) in another. This person may find that'resident' should be construed broadly and that the
he is obliged by domestic laws to pay tax on that gainterm 'liable to tax' does not connote an 'actual taxation
locally and pay again in the country in which the gainmeasure'.
was made. Since this is inequitable, many nations make2. Pereira Case (1999): Subsequently, a contrary ruling
bilateral Double Taxation Agreements with each other.in the case of Cyril Pereira (239 ITR 650) was issued
In some cases, this requires that tax be paid in theby the AAR. In this ruling, the term 'liable to tax' as laid
country of residence and be exempt in the country indown in the definition of a resident was construed
which it arises. India has such agreements with overnarrowly and was equated with the term 'subject to
60 countries. Here, we shall deal with its agreementstax' or actual payment of tax. As individuals do not
with Mauritius and U.A.E.pay tax in the UAE, it was held that the applicant Cyril
Some of the important tenets of the India-MauritiusPereira was not a tax resident of the UAE and was
Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement:not entitled to the beneficial provisions of the India-UAE
1. GBL1 companies can claim benefits of India-Mauritiustax treaty.
Double Tax Treaty which provides complete tax3. Andolan's Case (2003): Further, the Supreme Court
exemption to Mauritian tax residents in respect ofin the case of Azadi Bachao Andolan's case (263 ITR
capital gains income arising on sale of shares of an706) did not accept the contention that the avoidance
Indian company.of double taxation can arise only when tax is actually
2. No capital gains tax to be imposed in Mauritiuspaid in one of the countries to the tax treaty. Unlike the
enabling Mauritian tax residents to earn completely taxrulings given by the AAR, the Supreme Court orders
free capital gains income from sale of shares of Indianset a precedent. The Supreme Court ruled saying it
company.was not persuaded to accept the argument that
3. Indian Supreme Court's ruling in Azadi Bachaoavoidance can arise only when the tax is paid in one
Andolan's case has laid down the clear law thatof the contracting states.
where a Mauritian entity has been issued "tax4. Abdul Razack A. Meman (2005): Everything was
residency certificate" by Mauritian tax authorities,back to square one, as in the case of Abdul Razaq
benefits of Indo-Mauritian tax treaty would be available.Memon, a UAE national, the AAR ruled that investors
This Agreement between India and the United Arabof the United Arab Emirates have to pay capital gains
Emirates (UAE) has been dogged by controversy astax on their investments in India. The AAR was of the
to its applicability to individuals residing in UAE, everview that Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements
since its inception. At the heart of the controversy isbetween India and the UAE were not useful for the
the issue of whether an individual can be said to be apurpose since UAE does not have a tax regime.
resident of the UAE and take advantage of theTo conclude, as discussed, courts have kept on
provisions of the tax treaty, given the fact thatindulging in a ping-pong of decisions, almost coming
individuals are not subject to tax in the UAE at all, andacross as not being able to make up their minds on
given the fact that a person has to be resident in thethe subject. The importance of foreign investments for
UAE under the tax laws of that state in order tothe economy does not have to be emphasized. Once
qualify as a resident of the UAE for the purposes ofand for all, the authorities have to arrive at a firm
the tax treaty. Some of the important tenets of thedecision and stop acting capricious.