| Co-authored by Jordan L. Eftekari, Esq. | | | | jurisdiction for real estate, business assets of a |
| (1) Introduction | | | | permanent establishment, and a fixed base for the |
| On November 2, 2007, the Wall Street Journal | | | | performance of personal services. |
| published an article: “Got $500,000? The U.S. | | | | These treaties provide for |
| Awaits (Government’s EB-5 Program Offers | | | | “competent authority” resolution for tax disputes |
| Foreign Investors Green Cards for Job Creation)”. | | | | (and information exchange), address double taxation |
| A Federal program known as EB-5 (Immigrant-Investor | | | | by tax credits, and may provide a U.S. Estate Tax |
| Visa), administered by the U.S. Citizenship & | | | | deduction for property passing to a Surviving Spouse. |
| Immigration Services (“USCIS”), encourages | | | | If a treaty contains a savings clause, |
| foreign investors to invest their way to living in the | | | | the U.S. may tax a Decedent’s Estate, or |
| U.S.A. | | | | donor’s gift, as though the treaty was not in effect. |
| Morrie Berez, chief of the EB-5 program at USCIS, | | | | Estate & Gift Tax Treaties (18) |
| stated: “The opportunity is truly beautiful to | | | | 1. Australia Estate Tax Treaty |
| individuals who want to live and contribute their energy | | | | 2. Australia Gift Tax Treaty |
| in the United States, and it creates economic growth | | | | 3. Austria Estate and Gift Tax Treaty |
| and especially jobs for Americans.” | | | | 4. Canada Estate Tax Treaty |
| There are 10,000 EB-5 Visas available every year, and | | | | 5. Denmark Estate and Gift Tax Treaty |
| only 867 issued in 2007. Based on the favorable | | | | 6. Finland Estate Tax Treaty |
| currency arbitrage (Euro/Dollar, UK Pound/Dollar) the | | | | 7. France Estate and Gift Tax Treaty |
| EB-5 Visa is a cost-effective, time-efficient way to | | | | 8. Germany Estate and Gift Tax Treaty |
| immigrate to the U.S. | | | | 9. Greece Estate Tax Treaty |
| An investor (and immediate family) can now obtain | | | | 10. Ireland Estate Tax Treaty |
| green cards (Permanent US Residency) with an EB-5 | | | | 11. Italy Estate Tax Treaty |
| Visa by investing $500,000 into a Government | | | | 12. Japan Estate and Gift Tax Treaty |
| approved Regional Center (currently, over 30 Regional | | | | 13. Netherlands Estate Tax Treaty |
| Centers). Investors receive the security of | | | | 14. Norway Estate and Inheritance Tax Treaty |
| permanent US residence without repeated visa | | | | 15. South Africa Estate Tax Treaty |
| applications. Citizenship may be obtained after five | | | | 16. Sweden Estate, Inheritance and Gift Tax Treaty |
| years. | | | | 17. Switzerland Estate and Inheritance Tax Treaty |
| The investment may be made in one of three forms | | | | 18. United Kingdom Estate and Gift Tax Treaty |
| with the EB-5 Visa: | | | | U.S. Income Tax Treaties |
| 1. Invest $1,000,000 into a business and hire ten | | | | Under U.S. Federal Income Tax Laws, an alien is either |
| employees anywhere in the USA, or | | | | taxed as a resident alien (subject to U.S. Income Tax |
| 2. Invest $500,000 and hire ten employees in an area | | | | on world-wide income) or a non-resident alien (subject |
| where the unemployment rate exceeds the national | | | | to U.S. Income Tax on U.S. source income). |
| average by 150% or the rural population is less than | | | | Non-Resident Alien: U.S. Tax Resident |
| 20,000, or | | | | An alien is classified as a resident alien (U.S. tax |
| 3. Invest $500,000 into a Government designated | | | | resident) if: |
| Regional Center and avoid direct employment. | | | | 1. He is a U.S. lawful permanent resident at any time |
| The $500,000 investment is the least expensive way | | | | during the calendar year (i.e., has a “green card”). |
| to satisfy the visa requirements in order to receive the | | | | 2. He meets the “substantial presence test” |
| permanent green card after the two-year period. | | | | (present in the U.S. for 122 days per year over a 3 |
| Although the first two types of investment lead to | | | | year period). |
| permanent green card status, they require an additional | | | | Substantial Presence Test |
| showing that at the end of the two year period, ten | | | | An alien satisfies the “substantial presence test” |
| qualified individuals have maintained jobs in the targeted | | | | for any calendar year (the “current year”) if: |
| employment area. | | | | 1. He is in the U.S. for at least 31 days during the |
| The minimum period of the investment is | | | | current year. |
| approximately three years. Once an investor | | | | 2. The sum of the number of days in the U.S. in the |
| emigrates they may apply to have ‘conditions’ | | | | current year and two preceding calendar years equals |
| removed after 1 year and 9 months in the USA. | | | | or exceeds 183 days (“183 day test”). |
| Processing takes up to six months. ‘Conditions | | | | 3. For the “183 day test”, each day in the U.S. in |
| removal’ means that the investment is no longer | | | | the current year is counted as a full day. Each day in |
| tied to the EB5, and the investor is then free to sell the | | | | the U.S. in the first preceding calendar year is counted |
| investment. | | | | as 1/3 of a day, each day of presence in the second |
| The EB-5 Visa investment may be a passive | | | | preceding calendar year is counted as 1/6 of a day |
| investment, requiring no active business management. | | | | (IRC §7701(b)(3)(A)(ii)). |
| With a green card via an EB-5 investment visa | | | | “Substantial Presence Test”: Closer |
| investors have the flexibility to take any job, run any | | | | Connection Exception |
| business, retire and live anywhere in the USA, with the | | | | An alien who meets the substantial |
| benefits enjoyed by U.S. citizens including property | | | | presence test may avoid being classified as a U.S. tax |
| ownership or education. | | | | resident if: |
| (2) History EB-5 Program | | | | 1. He is present in the U.S. for fewer than 183 days |
| The EB-5 Visa program was started in 1991. In 1991, | | | | during the calendar year. |
| the Investor for an EB-5 Visa was required to make | | | | 2. He maintains a tax home in a foreign country during |
| an investment of a minimum: | | | | the entire current year. |
| 1. $1,000,000 | | | | 3. He has a closer connection to the foreign country |
| 2. $500,000 (in a targeted unemployment area) | | | | (i.e., his tax home) during the current tax year. |
| The investment required the creation of 10 jobs. | | | | 4. He timely files IRS form 8840, and has not applied |
| For the first two years the program | | | | for a “green card” (IRC §7701(b)(3)(B) and (C)). |
| was only set up for those who were willing to invest | | | | The United States has 61 income tax treaties (see |
| and create their own business that would produce at | | | | below). To be eligible for the benefits of an income |
| least ten jobs. However, in 1993, the government | | | | tax treaty, an individual must qualify as a resident of |
| began to designate certain businesses as regional | | | | either the U.S. or the other country that is a party to |
| centers. Original businesses that existed in an area | | | | the treaty (“the contracting state”). |
| where the unemployment rate exceeds the national | | | | The U.S. Model Income Tax Treaty (Art 4(1)) defines |
| average by 150% or the rural population is less than | | | | “resident of a contracting state” as “any |
| 20,000 fit within the regional center designation and | | | | person who, under the laws of that state is liable for |
| were then eligible to be duly approved by the CIS | | | | tax in the state, by reason of his domicile, residence, |
| (formerly the INS). | | | | citizenship, place of management, place of |
| Between 1993 and 1998 several | | | | incorporation”. |
| companies were designated as regional centers. | | | | If an alien is classified as both a U.S. tax resident and a |
| These companies all competed for foreign capital from | | | | resident of its treaty partner (“dual resident”), the |
| the foreign investors involved in the EB-5 Visa | | | | tax treaties contain “tie-breaker” provisions |
| program. The competition that existed for the foreign | | | | which determine the dual resident’s tax residence |
| capital and the newness of the EB-5 Visa program led | | | | status as follows: |
| to abuses of the system. Most of the companies didn't | | | | 1. Tax resident in country with permanent home. |
| offer sound investments and were really in business to | | | | 2. If permanent home in both countries, tax resident in |
| collect fees rather than to fund an ongoing business. | | | | country with “center of vital interests” (personal |
| Many investment opportunities didn't raise the full | | | | and economic interests). |
| $500,000 investment capital or hire the required | | | | 3. If the center of vital interests cannot be determined, |
| number of employees. | | | | tax resident in country in which he has a habitual |
| CIS rightly wanted to stop these | | | | abode. |
| abuses of the program. In 1998, CIS wrongly applied | | | | 4. If the habitual abode is in both (or neither) countries, |
| their revised rules retroactively to people who already | | | | he is a tax resident of the country in which he is a |
| had approved petitions. CIS attempted to revoke | | | | national). |
| these visa petitions. This started the litigation. The | | | | An alien who claims the benefit of a treaty, to be |
| litigation that ensued put the program on hold from | | | | classified as a non-resident, will still be subject to U.S. |
| 1999-2002. | | | | federal income tax as a non-resident alien. |
| In 2002, Congress passed a new law | | | | A non-resident alien who relies on a U.S. tax treaty for |
| to protect the pre-1998 investors. Also, in 2002, in a | | | | an exemption from U.S. tax that is effectively |
| case commonly known as "Chang" the 9th Circuit | | | | connected with a U.S. trade or business is required to |
| Court of Appeals ruled that CIS may not apply their | | | | file IRS Form 8833 to disclose the tax exemption |
| new rules retroactively. In August of 2003, CIS began | | | | reliance (IRC §6114; Treas Reg 301.6114-1). |
| approving regional center and EB-5 Visa petitions for | | | | Income Tax treaty benefits are available only to a |
| the first time since 1998. | | | | “resident” of a country and special rules may |
| The EB-5 Visa Program was amended in 2002 by the | | | | apply to determine residency of trusts, estates, |
| following statute (Pl 107-273 Sec. 11037 – 2002): | | | | flow-through and hybrid entities. Relief from double |
| “A regional center shall have | | | | taxation is afforded a treaty resident by specific |
| jurisdiction over a limited geographic area, which shall | | | | provisions allocating taxing jurisdiction over items of |
| be described in the proposal and consistent with the | | | | income between the two countries that are parties to |
| purpose of concentrating pooled investment in defined | | | | a treaty, and by a “treaty” tax credit provision. |
| economic zones. The establishment of a regional | | | | Administration provisions, providing for mutual |
| center may be based on general predictions, contained | | | | agreement procedure and for exchange of information |
| in the proposal, concerning the kinds of commercial | | | | and assistance in collection are intended to prevent tax |
| enterprises that will receive capital from aliens, the jobs | | | | avoidance and evasion. |
| that will be created directly or indirectly as a result of | | | | Special treaty residency issues are presented by U.S. |
| such capital investments, and the other positive | | | | citizens and aliens admitted for permanent residence in |
| economic effects such capital investments will have.'' | | | | the United States (i.e., “green card holders”). |
| As of 2002, Investors may invest $500,000 in a | | | | The United States taxes its citizens and residents on |
| regional center (in a targeted unemployment area) | | | | their world-wide income, wherever they reside. Such |
| without the necessity of creating 10 jobs. For the | | | | individuals may be U.S. Income Tax residents (for tax |
| $500,000 investment, an investor receives a | | | | treaty purposes) even when physically residing outside |
| “conditional green card.” | | | | the U.S.). |
| In January 2005, to improve and | | | | Under a treaty’s savings clause, the United States |
| expedite EB-5 regional center related applications | | | | reserves the right to tax its citizens and residents (as |
| USCIS established an Investor and Regional Center | | | | determined under a treaty) as if the treaty had not |
| Unit, (“IRCU”). The unit is the sole adjudicative | | | | entered into force. As a result, U.S. citizens and |
| jurisdiction for Regional Center applications pursuant to | | | | residents may not use a U.S. Income Tax Treaty to |
| the Immigrant Investor Pilot Program for purposes of | | | | reduce U.S. Income Tax. |
| approval, denial and Requests for Evidence (RFE's). | | | | Income earned through a fiscally transparent entity (i.e., |
| The unit also monitors and follows up on the actions of | | | | partnership, limited liability company, grantor trust) will be |
| approved Regional Centers to ensure compliance with | | | | considered to be derived by a treaty resident if the |
| the terms, scope, and conditions of their approval | | | | residency country considers that person as deriving |
| designation relative to their approved business plans | | | | the item of income. |
| and indirect job creation methodologies. Finally, the unit | | | | In the case of non-grantor trusts and estates, treaty |
| develops and proposes EB-5 program, policy, and | | | | “residency” (i.e., the liability for income tax) is |
| regulation changes or improvements to USCIS | | | | determined by the domicile, residence, place of |
| management. | | | | management of the estate or trust. The trust or |
| The CIS is constantly continuing their efforts to | | | | estate is liable for tax in the treaty per the country (not |
| expedite and organize the EB-5 program. Up until | | | | whether income is liable to tax in the “hands” of |
| January 2009, there were three different filing locations | | | | the trust/estate or its beneficiaries). |
| for visa and/or regional center petitions. Currently the | | | | A non-resident partner of a U.S. partnership (trade or |
| CIS has established a unit at the California Service | | | | business in the U.S.) is taxable by the U.S. in the |
| Center and utilizes it as the sole location to file for the | | | | partner’s share of partnership income (under the |
| EB-5 program. This center is comprised of | | | | branch profits article of a U.S. income tax treaty). |
| specially-trained adjudicators dedicated to EB-5 | | | | Any gains from the sale of such a partnership interest |
| adjudications. By consolidating adjudications at the | | | | will be taxable by the U.S. to the extent the gains are |
| center, USCIS believes that it will be able to reduce | | | | attributable to business assets of the partnership |
| overall processing times and better monitor EB-5 | | | | (Donroy v. U.S. 301 F.2d 200 (9th Cir 1962), Unger v. |
| related adjudications. | | | | Commr 936 F.2d 316 (D.C. Cir. 1991), aff’g T.C. |
| (3) U.S. Tax Issues – Non-Resident Aliens | | | | Memo 1991-15; Rev. Rul. 91-32 1991-1 C.B. 107). |
| U.S. Estate Tax (Non-Resident Aliens) | | | | Non-resident shareholders of U.S. corporations are |
| A non-resident alien is subject to U.S. estate tax on | | | | subject to a 30% statutory withholding tax on U.S. |
| their taxable estate assets situated in the U.S. (IRC | | | | source dividends that are not “effectively |
| §2101(a), 2106(a)). | | | | connected” business income and paid to a |
| For U.S. estate tax, both stock of a U.S. corporation | | | | non-resident (IRC §871(a), 881(a), 1441(a)). The |
| (IRC §2104) and U.S. real estate (Treas Reg | | | | withholding rate may be reduced by treaty. |
| §20.2104-1(a)91)) are “situated” in the U.S. | | | | Income tax treaties seek to prevent double taxation |
| Non-resident aliens are entitled to: | | | | by: |
| 1. Unlimited deduction for transfers to U.S. citizen | | | | 1. Assigning primary taxing jurisdiction over a resident |
| spouses (IRC §2106(a)(3)). | | | | to one treaty partner. |
| 2. A “$60,000 unified credit”, which permits a | | | | 2. Limiting source country taxation of income. |
| non-resident alien to transfer only $60,000 worth of | | | | 3. Providing a foreign tax credit by the resident country |
| property free of estate tax. | | | | for items of income taxed by both the source and |
| 3. Deduct a portion of expenses, indebtedness, taxes | | | | residence countries. |
| and losses from their gross estates (IRC §2106(a)(1)), | | | | Under U.S. Income Tax treaties, interest, royalties |
| deduct certain charitable contributions from their gross | | | | (intellectual property: copyrights, patents, trademarks) is |
| estates (IRC §2106(a)(2)(A)), but only if they disclose | | | | taxable by the owner’s country of residence (i.e., |
| their world-wide estate in their estate tax return (IRC | | | | the source country attributes the income to |
| §2106(b)). | | | | owner’s country of residence). |
| A person who acquires property from a non-resident | | | | Under U.S. Income Tax treaties, source country |
| alien decedent will receive a “stepped-up” basis | | | | taxation is preserved for real estate income (i.e., the |
| in the property (i.e., a basis equal to the fair market | | | | source country has the primary taxing right). The |
| value of the property at the date of the | | | | source country does not have the exclusive taxing |
| decedent’s death) regardless of whether the | | | | right; avoidance of double taxation depends upon the |
| property was includible in the non-resident alien’s | | | | residence country granting a tax credit for source |
| gross estate for estate tax purposes (IRC §1014(b)). | | | | country tax. |
| Generation Skipping Tax | | | | Capital Gains |
| Non-resident aliens are subject to the generation | | | | Under U.S. domestic tax rules, the U.S. retains the right |
| skipping tax but only on gifts subject to gift or estate | | | | to tax gains realized by a non-resident from the sale |
| tax (e.g., no gift tax on lifetime “skips” of | | | | of U.S. real property holding companies (IRC §897). |
| intangible property). | | | | Gains realized by a non-resident from the sale of |
| U.S. Gift Tax (Non-Resident Aliens) | | | | personal property are “foreign source” and not |
| A non-resident alien is subject to gift tax when he | | | | taxable by the U.S. (IRC §865). |
| makes a gift of real or tangible personal property | | | | Under U.S. tax treaties, gains from the sale of real |
| situated in the U.S. (IRC §2501(a)(1), §2511(a); Treas | | | | property are taxable by the country in which the real |
| Reg §25.2511-1(b)). | | | | property is located. The source country has the |
| A gift of U.S. real estate is subject to gift tax (Treas | | | | primary taxing right which is not an exclusive right. |
| Reg §25.2511-3(b)(1)). | | | | Avoidance of double taxation will depend upon |
| A gift of U.S. intangible personal property is not subject | | | | whether the resident country grants a credit for |
| to gift tax (IRC §2501(a)(2)). | | | | source country taxes. |
| Non-resident aliens are not entitled to the unified credit | | | | Personal Services |
| ($1M in gifts exempt from tax). | | | | Income from employment may be |
| Non-resident aliens are entitled to: | | | | taxed in the country of residence. Income from |
| 1. $13,000 annual exclusion for gifts to any person. | | | | furnishing personal services (i.e., not employee |
| 2. Unlimited exclusion for gifts to defray educational or | | | | services) is taxed by the source country as |
| medical expenses. | | | | “business profits” derived from furnishing |
| 3. The unlimited exclusion for gifts to citizen spouses. | | | | personal services. Income that may be taxed as |
| 4. The $133,000 (2009) annual exclusion for gifts to | | | | business profits includes all income from the |
| non-citizen spouses (see: Rev Proc 2008-66, IRC | | | | performance of the personal services carried on by |
| §2503(b); 2503 (e), Treas Reg §25.2523(i)-(1)(a), | | | | the partnership and any income from ancillary activities |
| (c)(2)). | | | | to the performance of these services. |
| 5. Unlimited amount of property to U.S. charity free of | | | | For employees, compensation for |
| gift tax (IRC §2522(b)). | | | | personal services (i.e., dependent personal services) |
| 6. Unlimited amount of property to a trust, or | | | | may be taxed by the employee’s residence |
| foundation, only if the gift is to be used within the U.S. | | | | country and by the source country, to the extent the |
| 7. Basis of property, acquired by gift from a | | | | services are performed in the source country (see |
| non-resident alien is determined in the same manner as | | | | U.S. Model Income Tax Treaty Art. 14(1)). |
| property basis acquired by gift from a resident alien | | | | The source country retains the right |
| (IRC §1015, 1015(d)). | | | | to tax all compensation from dependent personal |
| U.S. Income Tax (Non-Resident Aliens) | | | | services. If three (3) conditions are satisfied, |
| Non-resident aliens are subject to U.S. Income Tax on | | | | dependent personal services income is exempt from |
| U.S. source: (1) FDAP Income, (2) Effectively | | | | source country taxation: |
| Connected Income. | | | | 1. The employee is in the source country for less than |
| (1) “FDAP” Income | | | | 183 days during the calendar year in which services |
| U.S. Source “FDAP Income” i.e., Fixed or | | | | are performed. |
| Determinable Annual or Periodical Income (e.g., salaries, | | | | 2. The compensation is paid by an Employer who is |
| wages, interest, rents, dividends and royalties). | | | | not a resident of the source country. |
| A non-resident alien is subject to U.S. federal income | | | | 3. The compensation is not a deductible expense by a |
| tax on FDAP income at a flat 30% tax rate (without | | | | permanent establishment that the employer has in the |
| the benefit of any related deductions) IRC §871(a), | | | | source country (U.S. Model Income Tax Treaty Art. |
| 873(a). The flat 30% income tax is withheld at the | | | | 14(2)). |
| income source (IRC §1441). | | | | Athletes & Entertainers |
| “FDAP Income” includes: | | | | Under the U.S. Model Income Tax Treaty Art 16(1), |
| 1. Gains from sale of intangible property (i.e., patents, | | | | performance income of an athlete or entertainer may |
| copyrights or other intangibles) (IRC §871(a)(1)(D)). | | | | be taxed by the source country if gross receipts paid |
| “FDAP Income” does not include: | | | | by the entertainer or athlete exceed $20,000 for the |
| 1. Gain from the sale of stock of a domestic | | | | taxable year. If gross receipts exceed $20,000, the |
| corporation (Treas Reg §1.871-7(a)(1)). | | | | full amount paid the athlete or entertainer may be |
| 2. Interest on bank deposits and “portfolio | | | | taxed (not just the excess over $20,000). Tax may |
| interest” (IRC §871(h) and (i). | | | | be imposed under Article 16 even if the performer |
| Income tax treaties may reduce or eliminate the 30% | | | | would have been exempt from tax under Article 17 |
| flat tax on the FDAP Income. | | | | (Business Profits) or Article 14 (Income from |
| (2) Effectively Connected Income | | | | Employment) of the U.S. Model Income Tax Treaty. |
| Income that is “effectively connected” to a U.S. | | | | If an “employer” corporation provides the |
| trade or business. | | | | entertainer/athlete’s services, the income may be |
| A non-resident alien, who is engaged in a U.S. trade or | | | | taxed in the country in which the activities are |
| business, is subject to U.S. federal income tax on his | | | | exercised unless the contract pursuant to which the |
| “effectively connected income”, at same tax | | | | personal services are performed allows the Employer |
| rates as U.S. citizens and resident aliens (IRC | | | | Corporation to designate the individual who is to |
| §871(b)). | | | | perform the personal activities (U.S. Model Tax Treaty |
| For a non-resident alien, engaging in a U.S. trade or | | | | 16(2)). |
| business is not the basis for U.S. income tax. U.S. | | | | Income is deemed to accrue to the Employer |
| income tax is imposed if a non-resident alien owns a | | | | Corporation if it controls or has the right to receive |
| business through a permanent establishment in the U.S., | | | | gross income in connection with the performer’s |
| i.e., a fixed place of business, (e.g., place of | | | | services (Article 16). |
| management, a branch, an office, a factory). | | | | Foreign Tax Credits |
| If the non-resident alien is a resident of a country with | | | | Under the Model Treaty, the U.S. as |
| which the U.S. has an income tax treaty, the treaty | | | | the country of residence provides its citizens and |
| may reduce or eliminate U.S. federal income tax on | | | | residents with a credit for income taxes imposed by a |
| effectively connected income. | | | | treaty partner to release double taxation. The |
| A non-resident alien must file IRS Form 8833 to | | | | creditable taxes are listed in the treaty (Art 23(1)). |
| disclose reliance on a U.S. tax treaty for an exemption | | | | The U.S. statutory foreign tax credit rules determine |
| from U.S. tax on “effectively connected income.” | | | | the amount of the tax credit (U.S. Model Treaty Article |
| (4) U.S. Tax Treaties | | | | 23). The U.S. will allow a foreign tax credit pursuant |
| Introduction | | | | to the treaty credit article, even if a credit would not |
| In the 21st Century, world globalization | | | | otherwise be available under the U.S. statutory foreign |
| has produced the following results: | | | | tax credit rules. |
| 1. Instantaneous global communications | | | | Administrative Provisions |
| 2. Multi-national investors (with transnational families) | | | | U.S. Income Tax Treaties grant permission to |
| 3. International mobility of people on a previously | | | | authorities of each country to deal directly with each |
| unimagined scale | | | | other to resolve taxation disputes, to exchange |
| International investors in the U.S. face immigration | | | | information and assist each other in tax collection |
| issues (i.e., legal presence) and Income, Estate & | | | | (Model Treaty Art. 25: Mutual Agreement Procedures, |
| Gift Tax issues, potential “double taxation” (in the | | | | Art 26: Exchange of Information). |
| U.S. and their country of citizenship), potential “triple | | | | Income Tax Treaties (61) |
| taxation” (if they have a third country of residence). | | | | 1. Australia Income Tax Treaty |
| The U.S. currently has 61 Income Tax and 18 Estate | | | | 2. Austria Income Tax Treaty |
| & Gift Tax Treaties (see, below). A Tax Treaty | | | | 3. Bangladesh Income Tax Treaty |
| is a bi-lateral agreement, between two (2) countries, in | | | | 4. Barbados Income Tax Treaty |
| which country modifies their tax laws for reciprocal | | | | 5. Belgium Income Tax Treaty |
| benefits. | | | | 6. Bermuda Income Tax Treaty |
| Tax Treaties have three (3) objectives: | | | | 7. Bulgaria Income Tax Treaty |
| 1. Prevent double taxation | | | | 8. Canada Income Tax Treaty |
| 2. Prevent discriminatory tax treatment of a resident | | | | 9. China Income Tax Treaty |
| of a treaty-country | | | | 10. Cyprus Income Tax Treaty |
| 3. Permit reciprocal tax administration to prevent tax | | | | 11. Czech Republic Income Tax Treaty |
| avoidance and evasion (see: Rev. Rul. 91-23, §2.01, | | | | 12. Denmark Income Tax Treaty |
| 1991-1 C.B. 534) | | | | 13. Egypt Income Tax Treaty |
| U.S. Estate & Gift Tax Treaties | | | | 14. Estonia Income Tax Treaty |
| Under U.S. Federal Estate & Gift Tax Laws, an | | | | 15. Finland Income Tax Treaty |
| alien is taxed as a U.S. Estate & Gift Tax | | | | 16. France Income Tax Treaty |
| Resident once he establishes a U.S. domicile. An alien | | | | 17. Germany Income Tax Treaty |
| acquires a U.S. domicile by living in the U.S. (for even a | | | | 18. Ghana Income Tax Treaty (Ships and Aircraft) |
| brief period of time) with the requisite intention to | | | | 19. Greece Income Tax Treaty |
| indefinitely remain (Treas Reg §20.0 – 1 (b)(1) | | | | 20. Hungary Income Tax Treaty |
| Treas Reg §25.2501 – 1(b)) | | | | 21. Iceland Income Tax Treaty |
| An alien, who establishes a U.S. domicile, is subject to: | | | | 22. India Income Tax Treaty |
| 1. A U.S. Gift tax on the donor’s act of making the | | | | 23. Indonesia Income Tax Treaty |
| gift (transfer of asset) (IRC §2501(a)) | | | | 24. Ireland Income Tax Treaty |
| 2. A U.S. Estate tax on the transfer of their taxable | | | | 25. Israel Income Tax Treaty |
| estate (worldwide assets) (IRC §2001(a)) | | | | 26. Italy Income Tax Treaty |
| Since 1976, a unified tax rate is applied to assets | | | | 27. Jamaica Income Tax Treaty |
| transferred for both estate and gift tax (tax free gifts | | | | 28. Japan Income Tax Treaty |
| up to $1M, tax free estate up to $3.5M (2009), which | | | | 29. Jordan Income Tax Treaty (Shipping and Aircraft) |
| includes gifts). | | | | 30. Kazakhstan Income Tax Treaty |
| Top Tax Rate (2009): 45% | | | | 31. Korea Income Tax Treaty |
| The United States has 18 estate & gift tax | | | | 32. Latvia Income Tax Treaty |
| treaties (see below). To qualify for the treaty tax | | | | 33. Lithuania Income Tax Treaty |
| benefits, an alien must be domiciled in either the U.S. or | | | | 34. Luxembourg Income Tax Treaty |
| a U.S. Treaty Country i.e., country of origin (or choice), | | | | 35. Malta Income Tax Treaty |
| at the time of his death or at the time of the gift. | | | | 36. Mexico Income Tax Treaty |
| The treaties contain special tax rules which may | | | | 37. Morocco Income Tax Treaty |
| reduce the alien’s U.S. Federal estate and gift tax | | | | 38. Netherlands Income Tax Treaty |
| liability. The treaties are designed to prevent double | | | | 39. New Zealand Income Tax Treaty |
| taxation on the transfer of the same asset (which is | | | | 40. Norway Income and Property Tax Treaty |
| the subject of the estate or gift tax). | | | | 41. Pakistan Income Tax Treaty |
| U.S. Estate Tax Treaties are either | | | | 42. Philippines Income Tax Treaty |
| non-comprehensive (Estate Tax only) or | | | | 43. Poland Income Tax Treaty |
| comprehensive (Estate & Gift | | | | 44. Portugal Income Tax Treaty |
| Tax).Non-Comprehensive Treaties | | | | 45. Romania Income Tax Treaty |
| Non-comprehensive treaties deal | | | | 46. Russia Income Tax Treaty |
| exclusively with Estate Taxes, providing “situs | | | | 47. Slovak Republic Income Tax Treaty |
| rules” for specific assets and determining which | | | | 48. Slovenia Income Tax Treaty |
| country has jurisdiction to impose tax on the assets. | | | | 49. South Africa Income Tax Treaty |
| Estate tax deductions (and specific exemptions) are | | | | 50. Spain Income Tax Treaty |
| allowed under the law of the country imposing the tax. | | | | 51. Sri Lanka Income Tax Treaty |
| Estate Tax Treaties provide tax | | | | 52. Sweden Income Tax Treaty |
| credits to eliminate double taxation. Each country | | | | 53. Switzerland Income Tax Treaty |
| allows a credit against its Estate Tax, in accordance | | | | 54. Thailand Income Tax Treaty |
| with a formula specified in the treaty, with respect to | | | | 55. Trinidad and Tobago Income Tax Treaty |
| property situated in either country or both countries. | | | | 56. Tunisia Income Tax Treaty |
| Comprehensive Treaties | | | | 57. Turkey Income Tax Treaty |
| Comprehensive Treaties address | | | | 58. Ukraine Income Tax Treaty |
| both Estate & Gift Taxes, determine primary | | | | 59. United Kingdom Income Tax Treaty |
| taxing jurisdiction and Decedent’s residence (based | | | | 60. USSR Income Tax Treaty |
| on domicile). Location determines primary taxing | | | | 61. |