| rnishments | | | | and unfiled tax returns. The IRS had filed SFR returns |
| Glen H. (Philadelphia, PA) | | | | for him. ITS was able to negotiate an Installment |
| His Social Security payments were being garnished. | | | | Agreement for Joseph with his Revenue Officer and |
| Instant Tax Solutions (ITS) was able to have the | | | | get his levy leased before his next paycheck. ITS later |
| garnishment released by qualifying his IRS account to | | | | filed original returns for 2 of the tax years, reducing his |
| be placed in a Currently Non-Collectible status. | | | | tax liability by approximately $90,000. |
| Subsequently, ITS submitted an Offer in Compromise | | | | Bank Account Levies |
| for Glen and settled his $40,700 tax debt for $1,000. | | | | Bryan H. (Wichita, KS) |
| Robert R. (Lynn, MA) | | | | His father's checking and savings accounts were |
| As a 1099 subcontractor, 1099 invoices due him had | | | | levied for $4,000 due to Bryan's outstanding tax liability. |
| been frozen. ITS was able to prove to the IRS that his | | | | ITS was able to prove that Bryan was an authorized |
| monthly expenses exceeded his monthly income. The | | | | signer only on these accounts and the funds did not |
| levy was released enabling him to pay his current living | | | | belong to him. As a result, the IRS released the bank |
| expenses. Robert is currently pursuing an Offer in | | | | levy. ITS then submitted a request for Offer in |
| Compromise with ITS representation. | | | | Compromise that is pending IRS acceptance. |
| Barbara D. (Virginia Beach, VA) | | | | Robert S. (Pleasantville, NY) |
| Barbara is a government employee. Her government | | | | The IRS levied his checking account for $8,600. ITS |
| wages were being garnished for 15% of her paycheck | | | | was able to obtain a partial release of $4,000 to |
| through the Federal Payment Levy Program. ITS | | | | enable him to pay his immediate living expenses. ITS |
| negotiated with the IRS to set up an Installment | | | | then set up an Installment Agreement for Robert with |
| Agreement for her and release the garnishment. It | | | | the IRS to pay off the remaining tax liability. |
| took several weeks of wading through government | | | | Marissa L. (Las Vegas, NV) |
| red tape before the garnishment was lifted. | | | | Her bank accounts were levied for $4,100. ITS |
| John S. (Abbottstown, PA) | | | | obtained a release of the levy by submitting a promise |
| John is a subcontractor for a large home improvement | | | | from Barbara to pay the account off in 60 days. She |
| chain, installing carpet. Previous to retaining ITS | | | | was unable to meet the 60-day deadline. ITS was able |
| services, John had his 1099 invoices garnished | | | | to prevent another levy by negotiating with the IRS to |
| repetitively. ITS was able to work with his payroll | | | | set up an Installment Agreement that was affordable |
| department educating them that a 1099 garnishment is | | | | for her. |
| a one-time levy against the current unpaid invoice only. | | | | Dave N. (Burbank, CA) |
| As a result, future 1099 invoices were not affected. | | | | Two of his personal bank accounts were levied for |
| ITS then assisted John by setting up an Installment | | | | $4,200. ITS was able to get a full release by proving |
| Agreement and removing $7,300 in penalties from his | | | | Dave needed the money to meet his payroll |
| tax liability. | | | | obligations. ITS then set up an Installment agreement |
| Joseph H. (Longview, WA) | | | | for Dave. |
| Joseph owed over $100,000 due to a failed business | | | | |