The role of government. Taxation. Business ethics

For the past two or three decades, determining theinterests of the citizens. It may exist in countries, where
role of the government in business cycle has perhapsthe expenditures of the government are not very high
been the central political and economic issue in industrialand consequently it need not to collect high taxes or
democracies. Although the number of nationalizedthe government has other sources of income, such as
industries is steadily declining in most parts of the world,profitable business activities. Or the police of the state
people with left-wing views still generally believe thatis to give more freedom to business to make the
the government has an essential role to play ineconomic situation better. But some governmnents
providing the economic infrastructure (public transport,have insufficient money to finance it’s expenditures
telecommunications, and so on) and ensuring theand they increase tax rates as an alternative of
provision of services such as education, health care,borrowing money. Or they may limit unnecessary
social security and perhaps housing, and regulatingbusiness activities. This of course decreases incentive
working conditions, health and safety standards, and soto work, because profits become very small.amd
on. People with right-wing views, on the contrary,many businessmen try to hide their incomes. There are
generally argue that many (or most, or maybe all) oflots of methods, both legal and illegal, to hide profits
these activities can be left to private enterprise andfrom taxation. For example, tax avoidance (reducing
the market system, and that the role of thethe amount of tax you pay to a legal minimum) or tax
government should perhaps be restricted to activitiesevasion (making false declaration to tax authorities).
such as defense, the police, and the justice system.The higher the tax rates, the more people are tempted
They argue that too much regulation is bad forto cheat, but there is ? substantial «black» or
business, and leads to inefficiency.«underground» economy nearly everywhere. In
Foe example if we look at the role of the DepartmentItaly, for example, self-employed people - whose
of Trade and Industry which is under the jurisdiction ofincome is more difficult to control than that of
the British government, we’ll see the followingcompany employees - account for more than half of
picture. The key areas of DTA involvement arenational income. Lots of people also have undeclared,
developing of trade, investments and export,part-time evening jobs (some people call this
developing of industry inside the UK, and regulating or«moonlighting») with small and medium-sized family
ensuring open, competing markets, mergers andfirms, on which no one pays any tax or national
monopoly policy. And the main focus of DTI’s workinsurance. At the end of 1986, the Director of the Italian
at the moment is to provide detailed analysis of theNational Institute of Statistics calculated the size of the
markets, the priority markets that Britain is aiming fir, forunderground economy, and added 16.7% to Italy's
service of industry, and then help, particularly for thegross national product (GNP) figure, and then claimed
small and medium sized companies, to tackle thosethat Italy had overtaken Britain to become the
markets in an efficient way. The specific help is thatworld’s fifth largest economy.
each priority market, there are 80 of them around theTo reduce income tax liability, some employers give
world, have a desk officer who’s whollyhighly-paid employees lots of  «perks» (short for
responsible for providing information about thatperquisites) instead of taxable money, such as
country,  detailed economic and political description ofcompany cars, free health insurance, and subsidized
the market, sector information on whatever interestlunches. Legal ways of avoiding tax, such as these,
you. And then beyond that they can give you the helpare known as loopholes in tax laws. Life insurance
of the embassy of that country.policies, pension plans and other investments by which
Besides that kind of help, government can be of help inindividuals can postpone the payment of tax, are
other areas. One well-known American economist J.K.known as tax shelters. Donations to charities can be
Galbraith tried to describe responsibilities of the statesubtracted from the income on which tax is calculated.
as he sees it. First of all, in no country does the marketCompanies have ? variety of ways of avoiding tax on
system provide good low-cost housing. This is aprofits. They can bring forward capital expenditure (on
matter of prime importance and must everywhere benew factories, machines, and so on) so that at the end
a public responsibility, because  badly-housed orof the year all the profits have been used up; this is
homeless people are visibly at odds with the goodknown as making ? tax loss. Multinational companies
society.often set up their head offices in countries such as
Health care is also a public responsibility in all civilizedLiechtenstein, Monaco, the Cayman Islands, and the
lands as well as many other essential functions –Bahamas, where taxes are low; such countries are
parks and recreational facilities, police, libraries, the arts.known as tax havens. Criminal organizations,
All those are more needed by the underclass than bymeanwhile, tend to pass money through ? series of
the affluent. Those who attack the services of thecompanies in very complicated transactions in order to
state are usually those who can afford to providedisguise its origin from tax inspectors - and the ??li??;
similar services for themselves.this is known as laundering money.
In the good society it also must be attention to science,Business ethics
including medical research. The market system investsIn the 1920s, many large American corporations began,
for relatively short-run return. Therefore to supporton a wide scale, to establish pension funds, employees
science is the responsibility of the state.stock ownership, life insurance schemes,
But all above mentioned information doesn’t meanunemployment compensation funds, limitations on
that everyone share this opinion. According to anotherworking hours, and high wages. They built houses,
well-known economist R.Friedman, the role ofchurches, schools and libraries, provided medical and
government as it is now has greatly limited our humanlegal services, and gave money to charities. Since this
freedom. According to his words the limitationsis fairly surprising behavior for business corporations,
imposed on our economic freedom threaten to bringthere must be a good explanation. And I guess we
two centuries of economic progress to an end.have it.
I’ll try to explain this point of view. An essential partFirst of all I’d like to mention that such words as
of economic freedom is freedom to choose how to“ethic” or “culture” used to be considered
use our income: how much to spend on ourselves andas having less in common with business. But it’s not
on what items; how much to save and in what form;so. Nowadays the positive image of an entrepreneur is
how much to give away and to whom. Currently, moreessential part of any businessman, necessary for
than 40% of our income is disposed of on our behalfsuccess in business.  And hopefully this image isn’t
by government at federal, state and local levelsjust showing-off.
combined.Business and moral values are connected much closer
As consumers we are not even free to choose howthan it might seem at first sight. Business undertakings
to spend that part of out income that is left afterinclude dealing with people, creating different contacts,
taxes as there are a lot of restrictions on buying orand as you know contacts with people are usually built
consuming some goods – for instance cars withoutupon the basis of trust. You don’t need to cheat to
seat belts.get profit. It is usually the result of situation when
And freedom to use the resources we possess inmarket price exceeds expenditures.
accordance with our own values – freedom toThough many examples of concluding a bargain on
entry any occupation, engage in any businessparole testify to the fact that promise given by the
enterprise, buy from or sell to anyone else  - all theseperson you trust sometime more valued than money
are regulated by the state. Today you are not free togiven by somebody else.
offer your services as a lawyer, a dentist, for example,Cheating, compromises with one's conscience are
without getting first a permit or licence from awitnesses of immaturity of market relations, ignorance
government official. You are not free to workof businessmen. It seems to be quite logical, but many
overtime at terms mutually agreeable to you and yourpeople running their own businesses forget about this
employer, unless the terms conform to rules andelementary truism – unfair business has no future.
regulations laid down by a government official.Once betrayed, a person won’t trust you or even
So it was another opinion, contrary to the first one.start to play this game himself.
Both of them are quite logical and have right forSo to make a conclusion of the all above mentioned
existence.  Maybe we should combine themI’d rather say that a company, any business has
somehow  to create an ideal system suitable forresponsibilities to its suppliers, its customers, its
everyone?employees, the local community and society in general
TAXATIONas well as to its shareholders. It will provide profit in the
A tax is a payment of money legally demanded by away of fair bargains with partners, loyalty of workers,
government authority to meet public expenses.better environment, etc. Consequently large
Everyone knows that taxation is necessary in ?corporations introduced ‘welfare capitalism’ as
modern state: without it, it would not be possible to paya way of creating favorable public opinion. Even
the soldiers and policemen who protect us; nor therational capitalists, starting with Henry Ford, realized
workers in government offices who look after ourthat a better paid work force would be more loyal, and
health, our food, our water, and all the other things thatwould be able to buy more goods and services, and
we cannot do for ourselves, nor also the ministers andthat a better educated work force would be more
members of parliament who govern the country forefficient one.
us. By means of taxation we pay for things that weOf course, pure free market theorists disapprove of
need just as much as we need somewhere to livewelfare capitalism and all actions inspired by ‘social
and something to eat.responsibility’ rather than the attempt to maximize
But though everyone knows that taxation isprofit. Since the benefits of such initiatives are not
necessary, different people have different ideas aboutvisible, Milton Friedman criticized them for being
how taxation should be arranged. There are two mainunbisinesslike and for threatening the survival not only
ways, by which taxes may be paid:of individual corporations but also the general vitality of
1) each person have to ??? ? certain amount ofcapitalism. In newspaper article titled ‘The social
money to the government each year;responsibility of business is to increase its profits’
2) there is ? tax on things that people buy and sell.he argued that responsibility of any company is to
In most countries, ? direct tax on persons, which isconduct the business in accordance with their desires,
called income tax exists. It is arranged in such ? way,which generally will be to make as much money as
that the poorest people ??? nothing, and thepossible, while of course  conforming to the basic
percentage of tax grows greater as the taxpayer'srules of the society, both those embodied in laws and
income grows.those embodied in ethical custom.
But countries with direct taxation nearly always haveThus executives should not make expenditures on
indirect taxation, too. Many things imported into thereducing pollution beyond the mount that is required by
country have to pay taxes or "duties". Of course, it islaw or that is in the best interest of the firm. Nor should
the men and women who buy these imported things inthey deliberately hire less-qualified, long-term
the shops who really have to pay the duties, in theunemployed workers, or workers from ethnic minorities
form of higher prices. In some countries, too, there is ?suffering from discrimination. To do is to be guilty of
tax on things sold in the shops. If the most necessaryspending the stockholders’ (or the customers’
things are taxed, ? lot of money is collected, but theor the employees’, whatever)  money. Friedman
poor people suffer most. If unnecessary things likedoes not consider the possibility that stockholders
jewels and fur coats are taxed less money ismight prefer to receive lower dividends but live in a
obtained, but the tax is fairer, as the rich pay it.society with less pollution or less unemployment and
Probably, this last kind of indirect tax together with afewer social problems.
direct tax on income which is low for the poor and highAn alternative view to the stockholder model
for the rich is the best arrangement.exemplified by Friedman’s article is a stakeholder
The primary function of taxation is, of course, to raisemodel, outlined, for example, in John Kenneth
revenue to finance government expenditure, but taxesGalbraith’s book, The New Industrial State. 
can also have other purposes. Indirect excise duties,According to this approach, business managers have
for example, can be designed to dissuade people fromresponsibilities to all the groups of people with a stake
smoking, drinking alcohol, and so on. Governments canin or an interest in or a claim on the firm. A firm which
also encourage capital investment by permittingis managed for the benefits of all its shareholders, will
various methods of accelerated depreciationnot, for example, pollute the area around its factories,
accounting that allow companies to deduct more ofor close down a factory employing several hundred
the cost of investments from their profits, andpeople in a small town with no other significant
consequently reduce their tax bills.employers, and relocate production elsewhere in order
There is always ? lot of debate as to the fairness ofto make small financial savings. Proponents of the
tax systems. Business profits, for example, arestakeholder approach suggest that suppliers,
generally taxed twice: companies pay tax on theircustomers, employees and member of the local
profits (corporation tax in Britain, income tax in thecommunity should be strongly represented on a
USA), and shareholders pay income tax on dividends.company’s board of directors.
Income taxes in most countries are progressive, andAnother aspect of business ethic I’d like to cover
are one of the ways in which governments canconcerns the difference between legitimacy of some
redistribute wealth. The problem with progressiveactions and their relevance, conformation to the basic
taxes is that the marginal rate - the tax people pay onrules of society. Sometimes some actions we do are
any additional income - is always high, which iswide-spread but it does not mean they are legal. For
generally ? disincentive to both working and investing.instance industrial espoinage or bribing corrupt officials,
On the other hand, most sales taxes are slightlytelling only half the truth in advertisements and keeping
regressive, because poorer people need to spend ?quiet about bad aspects of a product. Lobbing, I mean
larger proportion of their income on consumption thantrying to persuade politicians to pass laws favorable to
the rich.your particular industry, is legal, but can be condemned
In many countries taxes are quite fair and do not harmby public opinion.